great ap test part4 aruba instant on

Aruba Instant On Ap12's graphical interface is extremely simplified and limited to a single screen. There we can choose the basic configuration parameters e.g. whether the device downloads network parameters via DHCP client or PPPoE server. It may be a little strange that the change of this configuration is not protected against unauthorized access, but we hope that with subsequent software updates, such protection will be introduced.

Of course, apart from the mobile application, we have the Aruba Portal, which allows you to remotely configure the basic parameters of the wireless network. A very big surprise is the fact how much and what statistics are made available for the manufacturer's network servers.

The purpose of our tests is to check the performance of the wireless mesh network created by two Aruba Instant On Ap12 Access Points.The network is checked for both signal coverage and real speeds obtained in the building. For 2.4GHz frequency connections, we have adopted the maximum channel width of 40MHz, and for 5GHz the 80MHz channel width. Although some devices in the 5GHz band can operate at 160MHz, due to the still limited number of terminal devices (phones/laptops) supporting such a channel width, we have omitted these tests.

The testing device was a MacBook Pro A1502, equipped with an AirPort Extreme WiFi card (Broadcom BCM4360 3x3, 1.3 Gbps PHY). The built-in wireless card supports 802.11a/b/g/n/ac standards.

Before testing the wireless network, we verified the maximum performance of the LAN and server iperf3. The aforementioned laptop was connected with a 10/100/1000Mbps network card to the switch. For one TCP stream we obtained the following speeds:

• downloading 894Mbps
• downloading 958Mbps

Aruba Instant On (AP-1 and AP-2) were connected to each other only in Mesh mode, that is only wirelessly.

We used AirSurvey software, which we already used in part one to make a reliable signal map, the second part and third of our test cycle. In order to correctly read the levels of individual signals, please refer to the colour legend at the bottom of the picture.

• Location of individual Access Points has been marked with an appropriate icon.
• The device on the "ground floor" has been connected to the switch via Ethernet 1Gbps port.

Ensuring that our performance tests of the mesh network built with Aruba Instant On Ap12, were very reliable, our series of speed measurements, was performed in the same way as the tests in the previous tests. Speed tests were performed using the WiFiPerf software, while the speed test server was running iperf3 software. A series of tests were carried out using the TCP protocol and the duration cycle 60s. Below are the results of Aruba Instant On Ap12 speed tests in relation to individual measurement points:

In measurement point No.5 , connection to AP-2 was not possible. The AP-1 and AP-2 devices did not establish a connection in MESH wireless mode at the tested distance. Therefore, for speed tests, the AP-2 was disabled.

I'm sure you'll be curious to know what innovations new firmware updates bring. The most important changes are listed in a few points below:

• Application and portal support for new 1930 switches, which will appear at the end of May.
• Service and configuration of shared services (wired and wireless) like chromecast or airplay.
• support and support VPN via NordVPN
• Shared ACL services - both in Access Points and switches
• Additional native support for 3rd party captive portals

Also important is the option to increase the range (wireless coverage) with 2.4GHz, which has a much greater range compared to the 5GHz band. "Range increase" is only possible in firmware from 1.4 version.

Aruba instant On Ap12 is a very aesthetic, extremely easy to configure Access Point from Aruba. However, there are a few details that may not necessarily influence our assessment of this access point well. First of all, quite a big surprise is the fact that the packaging Aruba Instant On Ap12 (RW version) lacks a PoE power supply and we have to buy it separately. The next issue is the necessity to use the mobile application during the installation of the device (no typical WEB GUI). The lack of security of changing the network connection method (DHCP/PPPoE client) and limited number of radio and network parameters, which we can set by ourselves, also gives a lot to think about. Very poor wireless coverage and therefore poor speeds obtained during our tests. We also noticed that the AP stubbornly holds client devices at 5GHz, even if the device is far away from our access point. Of course you can also notice the advantages of using Aruba Instant On Ap12. Ease of configuration! We have to admit that Aruba Instant On access point is an extremely easy device to configure. There is no need to have technical knowledge to configure the AP quickly and efficiently. Also noteworthy is the fact that the back of the case, which is made of aluminum. Thanks to that, Aruba Instant On AP12 very well isolates noise of the devices that are perfectly behind it. In general, Aruba Instant On is quite an interesting device, considering all the products we have managed to test so far. Particularly noteworthy is the free management from the cloud with a mobile application. However, it is quite difficult to draw any constructive conclusions from our tests, so we leave the summary for you...

Authors:
Wojciech Repiński
Leszek Błaszczyk